Is a 12 Megapixel, ancient Nikon D300 DSLR a viable option for scanning 35mm film? Especially paired with a cheap 1:2 macro lens? Let’s find out
The Setup:
My dad, an avid woodworker, helped me make a copy stand so that I could use my DSLR to copy newspapers for my thesis research. It’s a beautful oak affair — I’ll post photos sometime soon. The rest of the physical setup is a bit more janky — I have an old film holder from a flatbed scanner that I suspend above my laptop screen with a white image with whatever I have lying around. One day, I’ll get a Lomo DigitalLIZA or something similar.
For the camera, I use the Nikon D300. The D300 was a very highly regarded professional level crop-sensor DSLR when it was released… in 2007. I bought mine in early 2022 for about $160 in extremely good, nearly new condition from B&H’s used store.
I’ve previously used a Nikon DX 40mm f/2.8 Macro. Unfortunately, that lens got permanently borrowed from my car without my permission by somebody I don’t know. I’ll post more about it at some point, but it was awesome. Still, I wanted something, so I bought a used 55mm f/3.5 Micro-Nikkor from KEH for about $45. Forgot to buy the extension tube, and without it, it only goes to 1:2 reproduction ratio. This is not quite enough to fill the frame even on a crop-sensor camera. Once cropped, the D300’s 12 megapixels make about an 8 megapixel scan. Here’s uncropped (but resized) scan. To maximize resolution, I shoot in aperture priority, ISO 200 (base for the D300), and set the lens at f/11.
(note that the images you get when you click on the files will be a reduced resolution copy. I’ve included a few 100% 800×600 pixel crops that should show full-size if you click on them.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e57b7/e57b742a2672c46ef17760ee9c11e3f423aed497" alt=""
Cropped, rotated, and processed, it looks like this: (NX Studio export, 75% JPG — originally shot on a Pentax K1000 with a Vivitar 28mm f/2.8 lens on Fujicolor 100)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d463/2d4634ed142639b9243105880dec6a092982a0b3" alt=""
How good can you see the individual film grains? Here’s a 100% crop from the top-left side of the image…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93d10/93d1082a493aedc576d951defffc51dda1879571" alt=""
Here’s one shot on an Olympus 35DC on Kodak Ektar 100. Cropped and processed the same way.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7d0e9/7d0e952adcf097a40d871cca659f13cb2b05d1a5" alt=""
Another crop from the top-left
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/861b8/861b873a72132b97a93cf03fe9b0e32bd9ee936d" alt=""
And just for fun, a shot with an Olympus Stylus Infinity on Arista 200
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f92ff/f92ff8dee44e003f06e2a8697532ea7b706aa713" alt=""
So is the ancient DSLR usable for this task? I’d say absolutely. I’m planning on getting the extension tube for the Macro lens so that I can eek out a bit more resolution. That being said, I think this current setup works fine. Total cost to get into a similar setup would be under $200, for a bargain grade body, lens, with memory cards, etc. Add $50 for a film holder, and ensure you get the M2 or PK13 extension tube.
I’ll post an update once I get the extension tube.